Robert, a self-employed engineering consultant, retired at age 65 in September 2004.
Back in 1982 he sought advice on pension planning from an adviser who is now a director of Simple Finance. At that time he contributed to a number of pension plans and, following advice, initially increased his monthly contribution by £80.00 and then, subsequently, increased his contribution annually to the maximum allowed until retirement.
In September 2004 the adviser introduced him to another adviser, who is now also a director of Simple Finance, experienced in retirement planning and, following consultation, Robert decided on Income Drawdown as the most suitable retirement plan for his pension fund.
At retirement, Robert’s pension fund amounted to approximately £450,000. The fund was split equally between plans with Axa and Norwich Union and Robert decided to take an annual pension of £16,000 from his plans. This was not the maximum available. Along with his state pension and other occupational schemes from previous employers this amount took him up to the maximum for a basic rate tax-payer.
The flexibility afforded by Income Drawdown allows Robert to adjust his pension income so that he does not pay higher rate tax, but has sufficient income for his needs and is able to enjoy his retirement.
This case is unusual in many ways.
Firstly, it is unusual for a client to contribute the maximum to his pension plan and secondly very few clients do not take the maximum from their pension plan.
However, perhaps the most unusual facet to this case is that very few advisers are able to follow the progress of a client’s pension plan from the savings stage all the way through to retirement and beyond.
This case emphasises the long term relationship that advisers at Simple Finance strive to build with their clients and also the loyalty that our clients show in return.